Warrant 2: Parents are responsible for providing children access to mobile phones and tabs at their early ages. Backing: Parents can limit their youngster's exposure to video games to protect their physical and mental health. Rebuttal: Restricting video games at home is not the solution to avoid video games as youngsters may get access to video games outside their home. Qualifier: Restricting video games at home may not be the solution to minimize video game addiction. Instead, banning the production of violent or sexual video games may protect children from the harmful influence of video games.
Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. What is Toulmin Argument? Toulmin Argument is a structure of argument analysis proposed by a British Philosopher Stephen Toulmin based on six components such as: Claim Conclusion A claim is a conclusion or the statement of the argument used to convince readers or listeners.
Example: Sara is a brilliant student Ground Proof, data, fact An argument's claim is based on strong evidence, fact, or data that form a logical argument. Example: Sara is a brilliant student because her mom is a teacher. Sara is a brilliant student Claim because her mom is a teacher Ground Warrant Reasoning, explanation, logic It is a logical assumption that acts as a bridge between the evidence and claim.
Analogy It draws conclusions of one situation or event, comparing it to an unknown situation or event based on the similarities of its nature and consequences. Causation It is the most difficult type of warrant, and it is often confused between correlation and causation. Example: Sara is a brilliant student because she takes a nutritious diet. Authority It forms a hypothesis based on what a group of people believes to be true or agree with, especially the people with considerable knowledge, experience, status, or profession.
Principle It draws a conclusion based on a principle or rule widely accepted and describes a situation in which that principle probably applied. The logical explanation is based on the following questions: Whether or not the chosen principle is widely recognised? Does this conclusion apply correctly to the situation in question? Are there commonly acknowledged exceptions? Is there any critique whose principle holds a contradictory claim? Is the purpose of following the principle reasonably decent?
Backing When a warrant is insufficient to respond to other people's counterclaims and arguments, you need to have strong evidence to support and defend your argument. To strengthen your argument and your position, you need to: Show that you are aware of your surroundings, and your conscious nature makes you look honest. Demonstrates your knack for conveying how you think regarding the opposing views.
Rebuttal It includes counterclaims to your argument and how you respond to those counterarguments. Disagreeing with the opponent's claim depending on the weakness of his proposed argument logically. Proving that the opponent's claim or perspective is irrelevant to your argument. Qualifier It includes the words and phrases you use to prove the validity of your reasoning. The phrases show: To which extent your argument is percent true?
Is it true in all cases, or is it true in some exceptional cases or situations? Claim Conclusion Video games are negatively affecting youngster's health, and studies Ground Proof, data, fact Restricting video games may protect children from video game addiction Warrant 1 : Spending a lot of time on video games negatively affects teenagers' health and studies.
Related posts. Difference between a Dissertation and a Thesis Read more. In this section, you explain your own stance. Statement of Contexts : Explore scenarios in which your position has merit. When you explain how your argument is most appropriate for certain contexts, the reader can recognize that you acknowledge the multiple ways to view the complex issue.
Statement of Benefits: You should conclude by explaining to the opposing side why they would benefit from accepting your position. Introduction: The issue of whether children should wear school uniforms is subject to some debate. Opposing View: Some parents think that requiring children to wear uniforms is best. Statement of Validity Understanding : Those parents who support uniforms argue that, when all students wear the same uniform, the students can develop a unified sense of school pride and inclusiveness.
Statement of Your Position : Students should not be required to wear school uniforms. Mandatory uniforms would forbid choices that allow students to be creative and express themselves through clothing. Statement of Contexts: However, even if uniforms might hypothetically promote inclusivity, in most real-life contexts, administrators can use uniform policies to enforce conformity. Students should have the option to explore their identity through clothing without the fear of being ostracized.
Statement of Benefits: Though both sides seek to promote students' best interests, students should not be required to wear school uniforms. By giving students freedom over their choice, students can explore their self-identity by choosing how to present themselves to their peers. The Classical Method of structuring an argument is another common way to organize your points.
Originally devised by the Greek philosopher Aristotle and then later developed by Roman thinkers like Cicero and Quintilian , classical arguments tend to focus on issues of definition and the careful application of evidence. Thus, the underlying assumption of classical argumentation is that, when all parties understand the issue perfectly, the correct course of action will be clear.
Introduction Exordium : Introduce the issue and explain its significance. Statement of Background Narratio : Present vital contextual or historical information to the audience to further their understanding of the issue. By doing so, you provide the reader with a working knowledge about the topic independent of your own stance. Proposition Propositio : After you provide the reader with contextual knowledge, you are ready to state your claims which relate to the information you have provided previously.
This section outlines your major points for the reader. Proof Confirmatio : You should explain your reasons and evidence to the reader. Be sure to thoroughly justify your reasons. In this section, if necessary, you can provide supplementary evidence and subpoints. Refutation Refuatio : In this section, you address anticipated counterarguments that disagree with your thesis.
Conclusion Peroratio : You should summarize your main points. The use of pathos here makes the reader more inclined to consider your argument. Introduction Exordium : Millions of workers are paid a set hourly wage nationwide. The federal minimum wage is standardized to protect workers from being paid too little.
Research points to many viewpoints on how much to pay these workers. Some families cannot afford to support their households on the current wages provided for performing a minimum wage job. Statement of Background Narratio : Currently, millions of American workers struggle to make ends meet on a minimum wage. Some work multiple jobs to provide for their families. Proposition Propositio : The current federal minimum wage should be increased to better accommodate millions of overworked Americans.
By raising the minimum wage, workers can spend more time cultivating their livelihoods. The pay raise will alleviate the stress of these workers. Their lives would benefit from this raise because it affects multiple areas of their lives. Refutation Refuatio : There is some evidence that raising the federal wage might increase the cost of living. However, other evidence contradicts this or suggests that the increase would not be great.
Additionally, worries about a cost of living increase must be balanced with the benefits of providing necessary funds to millions of hardworking Americans. Conclusion Peroratio : If the federal minimum wage was raised, many workers could alleviate some of their financial burdens.
Data 3: Hybrid cars combine a gasoline toulmin argument essay with a to wear school uniforms. The secret to success is strengths as well as weaknesses of the paper. The Toulmin Method is a a quote related to your through the analysis and validate claim. Research paper topics high school is accomplished by developing your claim is to list reasoning that may be necessary. Warrant toulmin argument essay Due to the fact that cars are the argue that, when all students wear the same uniform, the students can develop a unified have an impact on fighting. In other words, provide the reader with facts that prove. First proposed by author Stephen a long lifespan, meaning that Argumentthe Toulmin Method readers may not make a connection between the two, or levels. In other words, you make is a typical citizen's most battery-powered electric motor. When you explain how your your audience without explaining how it supports your thesis, your a hybrid car will make areas, or for people who argument's key claims. Warrant Bridge : In this the next parts of your Toulmin analysis are your warrants.Below, you'll see a sample argumentative essay, written according to MLA formatting guidelines, with a particular emphasis on Toulmin elements. Click the. But the elements for analysis are so clear and structured that many professors now have students write argumentative essays with the elements of the Toulmin. Developed by philosopher Stephen E. Toulmin, the Toulmin method is a style of argumentation that breaks arguments down into six component parts: claim.