To draw the conclusion that Millhaven is no longer democratic, the author relies on data from a single election. In order to strengthen this argument, the author needs to consider elections over the past five or more years. Evidence of a consistently low or decreasing voter turnout rate would give readers proof that there is an ongoing problem with voter participation. If the election with the seven percent voter turnout rate were an outlier, however, the argument that the town is no longer democratic could easily be gainsaid.
When the author refers to the government as "a form of an aristocracy, not a democracy," the author also assumes that voters in the last election were made up of an elite group of people in the town. Without that data, however, the author's claims about elitism are unfounded.
This evidence is crucial for supporting the claim that Millhaven is no longer a democratic town. The author also needs to do additional research on causal evidence for the lack of voting. When referring to the latest election, the author assumes that most eligible voters did not participate due to indifference or disapproval, but the author never rules out alternative explanations. After all, the voting may have been held on an inconvenient date, or there may not have been enough information provided to residents about assigned polling places, issues, or candidates.
If the author could rule out these factors and consider more than one election, the residents' disengagement could be accepted as a factor that contributed to the low voter turnout, and it would be reasonable to discuss ways to address it. In an effort to support this solution, the author compares voting to jury duty: "Justice cannot be served when juries are made up of a select group of people, rather than a cross-section of the population. In the same way, our town cannot consider itself democratic when a mere seven percent of the voters determine our direction" Brainfuse GRE.
Maree Thus. Alan Clement. Gayle Smith. Sxnflower Gaming. Kai Gobeo. Loveena Narayanen. Sabina Sulovsky. Jacquie Caldwell. Abdullah Razee. Olivia Vouris. Napalh Deng. Cathie Gilbert. Robert Dore. Lynette Kyriakos. Sarah Hay. Hanah Maki. Robyn Rowley. Dr Omaira Noor. Aliman Aiyuchi. Tasfia Hossain. Cath Ant. Hie Ping Wong. Helena Cameron.
Marina Li. Anoushka Jain. Melissa Robertson. Zahangir Alom. Josephine Amelia. Veer Gupta. Chinmayi Krishnan. Nor Slee. Ashleigh Thompson. Goodealing G. Soala Gogo. Anoushka Venkatesh. Karen Mierisch. John Vilar. Bruce McCartney. Joanne van Slageren. Lauren Kay. Vansh Shah. Yvonne Z. Claire Craven. Sue Fairclough. Ruby BH. Diane Falzon. Nataliya Poshyvaylo-Towler. Daisy Chan. Kate Stewart. Jacqueline Smith. Noah Marklew. Shannon Virtue.
Anastasia Oresti. Michelle Conder. Sam Paynter. Janet Salthouse. Lay Koon Lim. Brooklyn Group Pty Ltd. Julie Miller. Caroline Nguyen. Noki Harley. Donna Acker. Kimberly Burgess. Nola Fitch. Mandy Rice. Vannesa xoxox. Con Banias. Rick Koster. Kay Murray. Grant Allen. Leanne Cini. Ojasvee Dewan. B C Sumathipala.
Amir Landarani. Conan Jones. Rosanna Damiano. Han Xie. Karen Noe. Lana Simonovska. Pauline Gauci-Chua. Nicola Yan. Linda Rai. Hong Le. Costa Tragakis. Bedshed Nunawading. Vanessa Aravanis. Melissa Armstrong. Lucy Menzies. Ashruti Pandya. Joe Gill. Tina Tsamis. Tammy van Wisse. Shabnam Khan. Melanie Cook. Gaurav Prasada. Carol Shamsabadi. Con Lappas. Warren Guest. Sharmeen 8 gaming. David Cheng.
Iva Stencel. Tanya Doig. Falguni Deb Chaudhuri. Penelope Davies. Sarah Glasgow. Ryan Pandit. Danielle Feng. Gabrielle langsam. Bernadette Walsh. Malu Alvarez. NATO Games. Paul Scerri. Jess Chapman. Ella Gressia. Sung Cha. James Macmillan. Chandima Perera. Zsolt Kunyik. Allyson Gear. Snez Talevska. Tristan Cleeve.
He argues the "trend lines on black crime, dropout from the the labor force, and illegitimacy all shifted sharply upward as the overall black illegitimacy rate passed 25 percent" Ramage and Bean Murray probably has his causality backwards. Murray admits that "white illegitimacy is overwhelming a lower-class phenomenon" Ramage and Bean 28 without stopping to consider that whatever measures he suggests for eradicating illegitimacy must take into consideration the causes of illegitimacy in order to work effectively.
When Murray does attempt to identify the root causes of illegitimacy, he comes up with a simplified and sexist version of puppy love. Surely the situation is much more complex than Murray calculates here. If this statement were true, then all races and economic classes of American society would suffer equally the plague of illegitimacy.
The reality of illegitimacy, however, is much more more complex and includes such variables as race, education, and poverty. Additionally, Murray provides no evidence that "girls think babies are endearing. Murray, however, assumes that girls are asexual beings, giving in to sex in order to have living dolls to love. If the real reason girls ended up with babies is because they like to sleep with boys to continue in Murray's "cutesy" rhetoric , then a real solution would focus, say, on birth control methods to prevent the babies in the first place.
Also troubling in Murray's essay is his repeated targeting of black America as an example of what could happen to white America. What happens within the black community whose ancestors were the legal property of white slave-owners, who were granted civil rights barely a generation ago, and who face current and continual discrimination to this date, can hardly form an appropriate analogy to the white situation.
Too many variables are unique to the black situation for anyone derive sweeping conclusions applicable to the entire white culture. Murray has essentially divided America into a white us versus a black them, and he cautions "us" against ending up like "them. Notice how the writer analyses the assumption and how the ideas are introduced and linked bold. In order to make these arguments, the article relies on a number of assumptions, which will be examined.
Perhaps the most common assumption is that the very small and select group interviewed is representative of all skip dippers in Australia. The article acknowledges that only people for whom skip dipping was at least in part politically motivated, were interviewed, therefore leaving out people who skip dip solely for economic reasons. These people may be much more numerous than their politically motivated counterparts and they may well fit the stereotype of being mostly young and poor.
In this same vein, the article assumes that the small group of respondents, and the numbers indicated on the websites used in research, are indicative of a growing trend. Notice how the writer sums up and connects the topic to the broader context. In conclusion, this essay identifies in the article four main claims and the assumptions on which they are based. The article has attempted to research and document an informal and relatively new movement that has not yet been the subject of many formal academic studies.
The skeleton below provides a framework for writing. You can download the pdf template. This argument analysis will be examining the article name of article. The article focuses on. This analysis will critically examine each claim and its accompanying evidence the assumptions underpinning the claims. Introduce article and briefly outline what the article is about. The first main claim is. Two pieces of evidence are presented Firstly. The first assumption is. The article acknowledges that.
In this same vein the article assumes that. The author has attempted to research and document. The article makes an interesting starting point to. Home Understanding the task Efficient reading Analysing an argument Writing an argument analysis. Writing an argument analysis A strong structure is essential as it makes the assignment clear and easy to read. Sample introduction.
By doing this, she sends the illusion to the readers that this is not Eliminating the distraction. Brain Development also plays a huge role in how students grow. Brain development for boys is completely different than girls. This is a prime reason why they should be educated separately. Having a single-sex class alleviates a lot of behavioral problems, especially with boys. There is also the learning environment kids are put in.
Girls usually have more of a sensitive sense of hearing than boys do. Argument essay Heroes can be found in every person if the person has the will to do so. Just like Wilferd A. There are heroic possibilities waiting to be discovered in every person.
The officer in the Green Mile, Paul, he was just an ordinary person that worked at the jail until John Coffey came along. Would that of made him a hero though? Letting John escape. Or did the fact that he respected John, and his powers make him the hero? I think a little of both is what made him a hero. He was still just an ordinary person, who had extraordinary opportunities in front of him that he chose to take to make him a hero.
He has a wife and no children. He just living his life. But his actions is what make him a hero. The essay must use appeals involving logos, ethos and pathos, as well as connect with a general audience. For an in-depth discussion of narrative arguments , see chapter 11 of Good Reasons.
According to the book, narrative arguments rely on concrete individual stories rather than abstract statistics; they allow the readers to draw their own conclusions; and they should strike readers as both truthful and representative of larger issues. Chapter 11 provides helpful tips on finding good topics and maps out an effective process to create a narrative argument see You may want to use the same topic for this essay as for Essays 3 and 4.
To explore good subjects for papers in this class, look also at Good Reasons chapters 1 , 2, 3 and 4. Your basic goal in this paper should be — at least in part — to persuade readers through narrative about a debatable issue. To achieve this goal, consider all aspects of the "rhetorical triangle" described in chapter 5 of The Everyday Writer and Chapter 11 of Good Reasons.
What is your purpose in sharing this experience? What questions will you be answering for your audience? How might your audience be sympathetic And they must be stopped. How people, more specifically the young ones are being lazy with how they text these days because they believe it really saves them a sufficient amount of time. They have transformed so many of our English words. John Humphrys' article is ineffectively written due to his use of difficult vocabulary, his lack of referrals, and his angry tone.
He writes about how he always has a copy of the OED on hand. He seems to be truly faithful to the way our language is spelled and how it is written. He discusses Their intrinsic ethos gets to the eyes of the audience, pulling them into the insight that they are knowledgeable of the effects of marijuana and the remedies. They state that criminalization of marijuana has done more harm than good. As argued, the prohibition has failed to curb marijuana trade. In fact, the legalization of marijuana is also believed to result in a significant reduction, in the crime level.
By legalizing marijuana, almost all marijuana crimes would be eliminated, freeing up and leaving the correctional institutions for real crimes. The marijuana business would also become a legal business like any other; people would not have to engage in smuggling.
They also argue that the legalizing marijuana would be much of the economic gain, as it would foster the reintroduction of hemp into the society, more so during these hard economic times. Additionally, the revenue collected from the sales of the drug would be a massive economic boost.
They also argue that the marijuana is not as lethal as other intoxicants such as alcohol and tobacco. In fact, the prohibition is heavily based on lies on lies and disinformation. All the assertions made are basically based on opinions and not facts. Proponents to the prohibition argue that individuals would easily abuse the drug causing harm to the body. However, fact has it that not a single death incident has been reported of a marijuana overdose. Lastly, High times argue that has some medicinal benefits.
The drug had been tested and ascertained that is has no medical downsides, contrary to other drug such as painkillers, nicotine and sleeping pills because it is not addictive. The strongest appeal used by High Times to advocate the legalization of marijuana is logos. In arguing for the legalization, they use factual statements which endeavor to convince the audience by making reasonable claims and offering proof in support of the logical approach to persuade the audience.
A consequence or cause and analogy appeals are used when High Times bring in the claims, in favor of legalization of marijuana. This reflects the overall benefits of marijuana, thus setting forth a logical argument and evidence for the calls to legalize marijuana. Comparison Although the response letter to Brook argument offer a sound debate in favor of legalization, the arguments are founded basically on own experience.
On the other hand, High Times offer a factual and solid argument for the legalization of the marijuana. They present a substantive analysis of the benefits of the legalization using various logical appeals. As opposed to Brooks, they offer a thorough examination of both sides of the legality issues, weighing on both the criminalization and legalization, before standing with legalization.
We accept sample papers from students via the submission form. If this essay belongs to you and you no longer want us to display it, you can put a claim on it and we will remove it. Just fill out the removal request form with all necessary details, such as page location and some verification of you being a true owner. Please note that we cannot guarantee that unsubstantiated claims will be satisfied.
Note: this sample is kindly provided by a student like you, use it only as a guidance. ID Password recovery email has been sent to email email. Type of Paper. Essay Topics. Educational Tools. Introduction Marijuana is a drug which its existence has spanned years and years.
Conclusion Works cited "Is legalizing marijuana a bad thing? Criminal Justice. Supreme Court. David Brooks. Accessed 26 May Free Essay On Argument Analysis. March Accessed May 26, Retrieved May 26, Free Essay Examples - WowEssays. Published Mar 27, Share with friends using:. Removal Request. Finished papers: This paper is created by writer with ID If you want your paper to be: Well-researched, fact-checked, and accurate Original, fresh, based on current data Eloquently written and immaculately formatted.
Hire this Writer. Deadline 3 hours 6 hours 12 hours 24 hours 2 days 3 days 7 days 14 days 20 days. Submit your old papers to our essay database and help fellow students to learn from example. This is your chance to pay it forward! Submit Your Paper.
Zahangir Alom. Josephine Amelia. Veer Gupta. Chinmayi Krishnan. Nor Slee. Ashleigh Thompson. Goodealing G. Soala Gogo. Anoushka Venkatesh. Karen Mierisch. John Vilar. Bruce McCartney. Joanne van Slageren. Lauren Kay. Vansh Shah. Yvonne Z. Claire Craven. Sue Fairclough. Ruby BH. Diane Falzon. Nataliya Poshyvaylo-Towler.
Daisy Chan. Kate Stewart. Jacqueline Smith. Noah Marklew. Shannon Virtue. Anastasia Oresti. Michelle Conder. Sam Paynter. Janet Salthouse. Lay Koon Lim. Brooklyn Group Pty Ltd. Julie Miller. Caroline Nguyen. Noki Harley. Donna Acker.
Kimberly Burgess. Nola Fitch. Mandy Rice. Vannesa xoxox. Con Banias. Rick Koster. Kay Murray. Grant Allen. Leanne Cini. Ojasvee Dewan. B C Sumathipala. Amir Landarani. Conan Jones. Rosanna Damiano. Han Xie. Karen Noe. Lana Simonovska. Pauline Gauci-Chua. Nicola Yan. Linda Rai.
Hong Le. Costa Tragakis. Bedshed Nunawading. Vanessa Aravanis. Melissa Armstrong. Lucy Menzies. Ashruti Pandya. Joe Gill. Tina Tsamis. Tammy van Wisse. Shabnam Khan. Melanie Cook. Gaurav Prasada. Carol Shamsabadi. Con Lappas. Warren Guest. Sharmeen 8 gaming. David Cheng. Iva Stencel. Tanya Doig. Falguni Deb Chaudhuri. Penelope Davies. Sarah Glasgow. Ryan Pandit. Danielle Feng. Gabrielle langsam. Bernadette Walsh. Malu Alvarez. NATO Games. Paul Scerri.
Jess Chapman. Ella Gressia. Sung Cha. James Macmillan. Chandima Perera. Zsolt Kunyik. Allyson Gear. Snez Talevska. Tristan Cleeve. Jodie Tasseron. Filly Head. GregandJulie Leitch. Tom Brotchie. Srinath Perera. Nitsa Karouzakis. Gillian Tang. Tom Yang. Rohan B. Charlotte Young. Long Tran. Bu Tracy. Celine Choo. Relax Jones. Tarun Singh. Alicia Nowell. Jo Philbrick. Anupam Misra.
Tina Wu. Kriti Raghu. Nishchala Singh. Gavin Watson. Jia Wang. TraceyE B. Devansh Bharti. Fiona Warner. Click here to return to the Home Page. Sally A. Student Sept. Using trends in black crime rates and black unemployment as cautionary illustrations, Murray predicts that white culture will be catastrophically affected by the recent increases in illegitimacy rates among poor white women.
To combat the rising rates of illegitimacy, Murray proposes that single mothers should no longer receive government support, forcing them to either involve other responsible adults from their families or communities, or else to give up their babies for adoption or to orphanages. In short, Murray sees his proposal as a shift back to the values and social norms of America's 's. Although many of the problems he outlines are indeed pressing and troubling, Murray clearly fails to understand the underlying causes of illegitimacy, making his attempt to form solutions extremely misguided.
Murray makes a crucial error in logic when he attributes a variety of social ills to illegitimacy. He argues the "trend lines on black crime, dropout from the the labor force, and illegitimacy all shifted sharply upward as the overall black illegitimacy rate passed 25 percent" Ramage and Bean Murray probably has his causality backwards.
Murray admits that "white illegitimacy is overwhelming a lower-class phenomenon" Ramage and Bean 28 without stopping to consider that whatever measures he suggests for eradicating illegitimacy must take into consideration the causes of illegitimacy in order to work effectively. When Murray does attempt to identify the root causes of illegitimacy, he comes up with a simplified and sexist version of puppy love. Surely the situation is much more complex than Murray calculates here.
If this statement were true, then all races and economic classes of American society would suffer equally the plague of illegitimacy.
The goal is mainly to halt the declining number of students and admissions by addressing these two issues GMAT Essay practice question 1. The conclusion, on the other hand, may be more or less plausible based on the evidence given Gmat Argument Essay Examples, cs lewis best essays, who is richard dawkins richard dawkins essay, good length for gmat argument essay samples sat essay. Throughout your communication, you have the chance to provide the writer with additional instructions on your order, making the writing process more effective and ruling out any.
Summarizing is a little shorter. By reading good argumentative essay examples, you can learn how to develop your essay and provide enough support to make readers agree with your opinion.. Note that the argument essay question always contains the following directive: Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument.
In the case of inadequate surveys you can explain what is omitted in the methodology Gmat argument essay questions for sample essay deconstruction Coefficient of variation is below, which indicates the link to personal or may not use contractions in your course. For example, in the case of the false cause you can explain what alternative reasons or other causes might need to be considered.
During the AWA section of the GMAT, you will be asked to write an essay in which you will analyze the reasoning behind a given argument. Each question is followed by this statement: Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. To write a good argumentative essay, you need to see a few good examples of this type of essay. Argumentative essays are an inevitable part of academic life. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking, etc Customer They are pretty broad and require.
Well, to start out, write a good introduction, and the rest of the essay will gmat argument essay examples flow. The Analysis of An Issue question in GMAT expects you to think over a controversial issue, take a position on it and or justify your position.
In line with the AWA directions, notice that I organized, developed, and expressed my ideas about the argument presented. For instance, I used an example of a specific brand of coffee Dunkin Donuts introduced this summer to counter the argument by stating it was a failure 5. The financial planning office of Fern Valley University suggests that a fundraising campaign be initiated in order to increase the range of subjects taught at the university and to expand library facilities.
Again during the tutorial, jot down on your notebook the basic structure of your essays or the opening sentences in case you get too nervous and forget them when the clock starts ticking.. Everyman Thesis Statement Examples Your task is to critique the stated argument in terms of its logical soundness and in terms of the strength of the evidence offered in support of the argument The conclusion also seems to.
GMAT AWA Sample Essay Analysis of An Argument In the argument above, the author gmat argument essay examples concludes that gmat argument essay examples the city council is not doing its job well and needs to focus on expanding significantly the police force in order to combat recent growth in the level of crime. So, in your essay, you might focus mostly on what else you would need to evaluate the argument—like all the different kinds of reasoning and evidence that the author would.
At his best, complete immobility set in, where are they Good Argumentative Essay Examples. My main subjects are sociology and political science. It might seem impossible to you that all custom-written essays, research papers, speeches, book reviews, and other custom task completed by our writers are both of high quality Cheap paper writing service provides high-quality essays for affordable prices. GMAT AWA Sample Essay Analysis of An Argument In the argument above, the author concludes that the city council is not doing its job well and needs to focus on expanding significantly the police force in order to combat recent growth in the level of crime.
Most argumentative essays follow either the Toulmin model or the Rogerian model. A negative balance on capital goods today s world and better part of an essay establishes the individuality of his uncle takes more than we produce, gmat argument essay examples the fewer apples we. Download a free AWA sample essay. Evidence is important to identify because on the GMAT it is always true. What they boil down to, though, are four basic criteria:.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Free sample of small business plan. Plan for College Sweepstakes. Free resume template help Help coming up with a thesis. The commercial features quite interesting representations. The main actor in the commercial is a middle class family who demonstrate how the Toyota Swagger Wagon is capable of assisting them to conduct their day-to-day activities.
The father employs the vehicle as a transport mechanism for ferrying of timber and transporting the family to school and other social activity venues. The mother also drives the family about using the vehicle demonstrating its user friendliness. The audio text proves to be as effective as the visual text. This is because the audio song that serves as a theme in collaboration with the visual effects of the commercial creates a very enthusiastic advertisement.
The commercial claims that the Swagger Wagon is applicable in everyday life activities therefore the best vehicle in the market serving the purpose. This claim has visual support within the commercial thus giving proper evidence as to their claim. However, the commercial assumes that most potential buyers are families of at least four members. This seems to be counterproductive to the whole argument because, if the car is truly an everyday care, then it should be useable by all members of the society.
Over the years, the company intends to shift its focus to everyday family car in a bid to diversify its product portfolio. The Dodge Dart is among the organizations everyday vehicle. The vehicle still maintains the primary attributes of the Dodge Organization sporting a stylish look as well as a powerful engine to retain the muscle characteristics. The staging of the commercial takes place in a suburban setting with the maroon car and two very close friends and neighbors Craig and Jake Johnson.
Craig is the owner of the brand new stylish car while Jake is the curious neighbor. The two argue about the car as Craig fears that allowing Jake near the car will result in Jake touching the car. This Craig does not want to happen because he sees it as somehow insulting to the car. Craig also fears that Jake might end up scratching the car thereby infringing on the stylish quality of the vehicle. When Jake tries to approach the vehicle, Craig turns defensive and at one instant, he slapped Jake because Jake directly threatened to scratch the Vehicle.
The commercial claims that the Dodge Dart vehicle is among the most stylish vehicle in its class enough to drive a wedge between friends and neighbors alike. Evidence to the claim is the periodic fuss concerning the vehicle between Jake and Craig.
The commercial targets the middle-aged men currently in the middle class social strata. The advert claims that the vehicle is capable of satisfying their social need for style and power in vehicles. The commercial also seems to assume that most men in that age group and social strata still value style and power in a vehicle thus positioning the car as the best option. Similarities The two commercials have striking similarities.
One of the similarities is that both commercials argue with respect to a vehicle. Both commercials propose their vehicles as the best in comparison to their respective peers. Both commercials exhibit a similar kairos.
Kairos represents a setting of the arguments. The visual setting is similar in both commercials since both have residential setting. Another similarity of the two commercials is the pathos element within the commercial. The pathos element refers to the emotional appeal to the audience concerning the two vehicles. In the Swagger Wagon commercial depicts the vehicle as the most stylish vehicle in their class thereby attracting their target market based on their emotionality.
This commercial also appeals to the need of most children to not have an embarrassing feeling characteristic of normal minivan vehicles. The Dodge Dart commercial appeals to the emotional need of its target market to stylish quality. The physical fuss between Craig and Jake shows that the vehicle is worth protecting with using all might possible Der Derian, The other similarity is the apparent use of the images although not prominent. Both commercials perceive the middle-aged population currently within the middle class social strata as people with style.
Therefore, the people fitting the criterion of the two commercials but lacking one of the vehicles lacks style within their life. Both organization hopes that this imagery will trigger a positive emotional response from its target market thereby convincing them to buy the vehicles. Differences Even though the two commercials have similarities, there still exists glaring differences between the two commercials.
The first commercial, Swagger Wagon commercial, the authors decided to employ the strategic argumentative approach of logos. The logos approach is evident because the authors employ illustrative imagery and video to evaluate their claim of the vehicle being the best within the market in comparison to its peers. The authors also employ explanatory text in form of audio and visual texts. The commercial also employs comedy as a tool to capture the attention of its viewers. On the other hand, the Dodge Dart commercial is not employing logos strategy to forward its message to its intended target group.
The commercial relies heavily on the pathos strategy whereby its main focus is to appeal to the psychological and emotional need by its target group on the need for style in their lives. The commercial fails to illustrate its claim comprehensively thus, its audience needs to employ a lot of thought in trying to dissect and discern the message within the commercial.
The two commercials also differ in terms of structure. The Swagger Wagon commercial is a short one-episode film spanning a time of about three minutes. This short film is full of comprehensive and explanatory text attempting to persuade a person in to purchasing the car.
The Do Not Touch My Dodge Dart commercial is a trilogy of short films whose message seems similar thus providing consistency but failing to provide more information concerning the vehicle. The use of images between the two commercials also differs in that the Swagger Wagon commercials use an aggregation of aural, verbal, and visual text to explain its meaning.
Conclusion Visual argument is increasingly becoming an important means to market a product. This is because a visual argument allows the marketers to incorporate a lot of information within the commercial. The two commercials illustrate the convincing ability of visual argument. However, the commercials could include a few basic things to strengthen their appeal to the public. For the Swagger Wagon commercial, the commercial could tone down on the audio song a bit to allow all the target market to understand the intended message thus clearing any ambiguity.
The second commercial, which personally seems to be the ineffective commercial, Do Not Touch My Dodge Dart could employ a bit of explanatory text that would further persuade the target market why the Dodge Dart is a good car instead of relying on the emotional attachment factor and superficial cues.
Incorporating these factors will definitely assist the commercials in achieving the desired results Alcolea-Banegas, References Alcolea-Banegas, J. Visual arguments in film. Argumentation , 23 2 , Birdsell, D.