The Rogerian structure includes the following parts: An introduction that gives a fair assessment of the opposition; a section detailing the viewpoints of the opposition and stating where you see merit in their views; the thesis statement that shows how you have taken the opposition into account but have still developed your own perspective; a section of support for your thesis that illustrates why it is valid; and a conclusion that illustrates why your position is beneficial to those on both sides of the argument.
It is important that the Rogerian thesis be delivered in neutral, non-adversarial language. The thesis should not be an attack on the opposition. In addition, the thesis has to be supportable. It is easier to persuade a reader of your point of view if you are able to offer support through research.
Show the reader why your way of seeing the issue is valid in certain circumstances. For some subjects, especially controversial and divisive ones, people have strong viewpoints. In order to get an adversary to listen to an opposing idea, it is important to treat him or her with respect. This means being willing to see worth in that conflicting viewpoint.
Successfully writing a thesis statement for a Rogerian argument means correct placement of the main idea in the body of the essay and writing the thesis in dispassionate language. Doing this creates the type of communication Carl R. Rogers advocated. Need to write a Rogerian essay but have no idea what the term means? This series defines a Rogerian argument, explains its structure, and tells how to create a successful Rogerian thesis.
Since the goal of Rogerian argument is to find a common ground between two opposing positions, you must identify the shared beliefs or assumptions of each side. In the example above, both sides of the racial profiling issue want the U. A solid Rogerian argument acknowledges the desires of each side, and tries to accommodate both. Again, using the racial profiling example above, both sides desire a safer society, perhaps a better solution would focus on more objective measures than race; an effective start would be to use more screening technology on public transportation.
Once you have a claim that disarms the central dispute, you should support the claim with evidence, and quotations when appropriate. Remember, you should quote to illustrate a point you are making. You should not, however, quote to simply take up space. Make sure all quotations are compelling and intriguing: Consider the following example. This statement sums up the beliefs of those in favor of profiling in public places. Skip to main content. Module 2: Rhetorical Analysis. Search for:. Rogerian Argument Carl Rogers.
In the letter, the narrator details the people in her life, from her father to her best friend at school. Recently, with the outbreaks of terrorism in the United States, Spain, and England, many are calling for racial profiling to stifle terrorism.
You should not, however, quote to simply take up space. Make sure all quotations are compelling and intriguing: Consider the following example. This statement sums up the beliefs of those in favor of profiling in public places. Skip to main content. Module 2: Rhetorical Analysis. Search for:. Rogerian Argument Carl Rogers. In the letter, the narrator details the people in her life, from her father to her best friend at school. Recently, with the outbreaks of terrorism in the United States, Spain, and England, many are calling for racial profiling to stifle terrorism.
The issue has sparked debate, with one side calling it racism and the other calling it common sense. Though the debate over racial profiling is sure to continue, each side desires to make the United States a safer place. With that goal in mind, our society deserves better security measures than merely searching a person who appears a bit dark.
We cannot waste time with such subjective matters, especially when we have technology that could more effectively locate potential terrorists. Sure, installing metal detectors and cameras on public transportation is costly, but feeling safe in public is priceless. Licenses and Attributions. Many people don't know that it was not the effect of cannabis that originally spurred its banning. It was actually originally the work of the cotton industry who put big money behind illegalization for the plant's mind altering effects.
The cotton industry was afraid that hemp, a product of the cannabis plant, would soon overpower the strong hold of cotton. The expression argument has two meanings in scholarly writing. First, it means a composition that takes a position on one side of a divisive issue. You might write an argument against the death penalty, or for or against censorship of pornography. But argument has another meaning, too. It means an essay that, simply, argues a point.
You might assemble an argument about the significance of ancestor myths in a certain aborigine culture, or you might write an argument defending your understanding of. A free education, free living; getting to travel and play the sport that many people would love to still be able to. Student athletes also get to pick classes earlier than a regular student and have the ability to be excused from classes to go to games and special events.
The life of a student athlete sounds like an enticing thing for many people; especially those who are not student athletes on scholarships or walk-ons. One of the elements of the Rogerian argument is cooperation. There will always be disagreements among people, especially within the United States Government and between politicians, this is more apparent now than ever.
Unfortunately there are people that are so stubborn they truly believe that their way, or their ideas are the only. When I signed up for this class for the second semester, I never thought that I would be challenged to come up with compelling arguments for not only my side, but the opposing side as well. One of the most difficult things that I found was coming to a middle ground through the style of the Rogerian argument, but most of all, I learned that to.
It also tell us why we make arguments as in why politicians or news anchors want to drown out other voices and win at all costs. Chapter 1 goes more in depth with different types of arguments and categorize arguments in different ways.
Rogerian Argument finding common ground and establishing trust. The actors self-absorbed, attitudes caused them to look fake and over-dramatic. As a last minute last hope effort, the director sent these five actors to, what he believes, is where the war actually happened.
Soon after arriving to this unknown land, the director is blown up by an old land mine.
In so doing, we should be able to arrive at a solution that considers both arguments and develops a solution that benefits both parties while still achieving our goal of allowing technology in the classroom. Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention.
We would lay out the differing perspectives, briefly mention the merits of each argument, and discuss the implications closely considering all perspectives to arrive at a solution that works for everyone. Here, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not be allowed in the writing classroom. We would also list and discuss their objections to the proposition of technology in the classroom.
Here we might provide specific details that lend merit to their argument. We want to show that we are fully considering their claims and not just giving lip service, in the hope that that they will give similar value to our opinions. We could include statistics, testimony from instructors and students, or even examples from media that support their theory that digital technology can indeed be a distraction during instruction.
Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology should be allowed in the writing classroom. We would still want to speak as objectively as possible in order to establish our ethos as concerned but unbiased speaker. We might even qualify our position by acknowledging that there are, of course, situations in which technology should be put away, but reiterate that, generally speaking, the presence of digital technology is a positive.
For example, we could gather testimony from students who claim that using these technologies in class has been beneficial. We could include research and scholarship that supports our position and even quote instructors who have developed pedagogy around these technologies. We might even subtly demonstrate that our opposition has failed to account for all possibilities by choosing our examples carefully.
For instance, we could easily include accounts of students with learning disabilities who might otherwise have a difficult time succeeding in class without the help of assistive technologies. We would acknowledge that some instructors do not want digital technologies present in the classroom, as they believe they distract from paying attention during lectures. We would maintain, however, that these technologies can indeed be productive tools for learning—in some cases, they can even be a virtual requirement for learning.
We could then offer a solution: that these digital technologies should be kept aside during lecture portions of a lesson except in the case of students with documented disabilities. This way, students will likely be paying attention, taking notes by hand which they can transcribe later if they so wish. However, once a class moves from lecture to activity whether group or individual , students should be allowed to access these technologies to more effectively engage with the activity, organize their thoughts, and access information.
Now that the instructor is no longer lecturing, it should be easier to monitor student progress and engagement and the use of technology for these activities will lead to more developed and better organized results from the students. Rogerian Argument The Rogerian argument or Rogerian rhetoric is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals.
Contents Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument. Introduction Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention. It means an essay that, simply, argues a point. You might assemble an argument about the significance of ancestor myths in a certain aborigine culture, or you might write an argument defending your understanding of.
A support of this controversial topic; congressional meeting and testimony, is from one of the top U. The actors self-absorbed, attitudes caused them to look fake and over-dramatic. As a last minute last hope effort, the director sent these five actors to, what he believes, is where the war actually happened. Soon after arriving to this unknown land, the director is blown up by an old land mine. The actors then find themselves trapped in.
After all, once the criminal is detained he or she is no longer able to harm society. However, if the goal is to separate the criminal from society, capital. Rogerian Argument On Vegetarianism Vegetarianism has been a hot topic of discussion lately, and if becoming one should be mandatory or not.
Vegetarianism is a diet choice of eating absolutely no meat, fish, or poultry. It can be a healthy and environmentally friendly decision, but vegetarianism is not for everyone. It can be hard for people to completely cut themselves off from eating meat. However, humans can slim down on meat to help the environment and live a healthier, more balanced lifestyle. Rogerian Argument Essay. Page 1 of 50 - About essays.
Beliefs, benefits Continue Reading. Children born into religious Continue Reading. In the introduction of this article, the author Continue Reading. Even though, as of , the NBA eligibility rule states that a player entering the NBA draft must be at least nineteen years old and a year removed from high school, it is still a huge debate in the sports world of whether or not this rule is the right choice Continue Reading.
Rogerian Argument Analysis Words 4 Pages The Rogerian method is a method for an argument which is put in to a negotiating way. She Continue Reading. Essay about Rogerian Arguments Words 11 Pages The expression argument has two meanings in scholarly writing. You might assemble an argument about the significance of ancestor myths in a certain aborigine culture, or you might write an argument defending your understanding of Continue Reading.
Beyond Continue Reading.