|Essay writing graphic organizers||Dino' and wife". Donate to WikiLeaks Unless otherwise specified, the document described here: Was first publicly revealed by WikiLeaks working with our source. The last count was a dissertation review of literature of corruptly endeavoring to obstruct and impede the administration of the internal revenue laws by falsely listing the IRS as kent hovind dissertation only creditor when filing for bankruptcy, filing a false and frivolous lawsuit against the IRS in which he demanded damages for criminal trespass, making threats of harm to those investigating him and to those who might consider cooperating with the investigation, filing a false complaint against IRS agents investigating him, filing a false criminal complaint against IRS special agents criminal investigatorsand destroying records. Main Page Country index Follow us. Available on Wikisource at Kent Hovind Affidavit. This to say her newcombe doctoral dissertation students tend more. If you cannot use Tor, or your submission is very large, or you have specific requirements, WikiLeaks provides several alternative methods.|
|Sample dissertation literature review||217|
|Kent hovind dissertation||Answers in Genesis:. If you are a high-risk source and the computer you prepared your submission on, or uploaded it from, could subsequently be audited in an kent hovind dissertation, we recommend that you format and dispose of the computer hard drive and any other storage media you used. Kent hovind dissertation - commit your report to professional scholars employed in the service Leave your essays to the most talented writers. Titus andronicus. Hovind appealed the amount of his U. Creation and evolution in public education Creation—evolution controversy Creationism Creationist cosmologies Cryptozoology Objections to evolution Omphalos hypothesis Pseudoscience "Teach the Controversy".|
|Structure of argument essay||How write a paper|
|Martin luther king dissertation||655|
If you do this and are a high-risk source you should make sure there are no traces of the clean-up, since such traces themselves may draw suspicion. If a legal action is brought against you as a result of your submission, there are organisations that may help you. The Courage Foundation is an international organisation dedicated to the protection of journalistic sources. WikiLeaks publishes documents of political or historical importance that are censored or otherwise suppressed. We specialise in strategic global publishing and large archives.
The following is the address of our secure site where you can anonymously upload your documents to WikiLeaks editors. You can only access this submissions system through Tor. See our Tor tab for more information. We also advise you to read our tips for sources before submitting. If you cannot use Tor, or your submission is very large, or you have specific requirements, WikiLeaks provides several alternative methods.
Contact us to discuss how to proceed. Donate to WikiLeaks. See here for a detailed explanation of the information on this page. If you have similar or updated material, see our submission instructions. Contact us. Press inquiries. I live in Pensacola, Florida. I have been a high school science teacher since Kent Kovind Hovind is a well-known "young-earth" biblical creationist.
As such the strength of his dissertation is of broad interest. According to our source, contrary to accepted practices in academia where doctoral dissertations are available to the public. Hovind, along with his alma mater, Patriot Bible University, has consistently refused to allow his dissertation to be offered for public reprint or scholarly inquiry. How to contact WikiLeaks?
What is Tor? Tips for Sources After Submitting. Contact us if you have specific problems If you have a very large submission, or a submission with a complex format, or are a high-risk source, please contact us. What computer to use If the computer you are uploading from could subsequently be audited in an investigation, consider using a computer that is not easily tied to you. Do not talk about your submission to others If you have any issues talk to WikiLeaks.
Act normal If you are a high-risk source, avoid saying anything or doing anything after submitting which might promote suspicion. Remove traces of your submission If you are a high-risk source and the computer you prepared your submission on, or uploaded it from, could subsequently be audited in an investigation, we recommend that you format and dispose of the computer hard drive and any other storage media you used.
If you face legal action If a legal action is brought against you as a result of your submission, there are organisations that may help you. Submit documents to WikiLeaks. D are allowed to prefix their name with "Dr". However, many choose not to do so out of modesty or so their expertise in nuclear physics, history, or philosophy doesn't get mistaken when a medical doctor is actually required.
Hovind, needless to say, has no such modesty and refers to himself as Dr. In fact, he even used the prefix in Pensacola, Florida's phone book. D vs Ben Goldacre. Hovind attempts to provide a genealogy of evolution that starts with Satan himself of course before he was cast out of heaven, then to God striking down the Tower of Babel. He traces this through ancient Greek philosophy, eastern religions, and the Church Fathers. He gets large chunks of this ancient history wrong, and what little bits of truth do sneak in are surrounded by oceans of irrelevance and idiocy.
Socrates , Hovind tells us, didn't write "many" books. Technically true: Socrates didn't write any books, and is infamous for asserting that one shouldn't write books! Hovind describes Socrates, Plato , and Aristotle as being " pantheists ," and thus attempts to understand in modern terms a religious system that does not easily match modern expectations and categories.
If you want to apply a modern label, polytheism catches the spirit a lot better than pantheism. There are some ancient philosophers you can describe as holding broadly pantheistic ideas: Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes, Zeno, and Heraclitus among the Greeks, and Marcus Aurelius and Plotinus among the Romans.
Hovind fails when he attempts to understand Plato and Socrates, ascribing positions to them that are held by participants in Platonic dialogues, most of which feature Socrates as a character, but only some of the dialogues can be thought of as containing the Socrates of history, while the others have Socrates as a literary tool that Plato can use. Most scholars actually state it was much earlier, around BCE.
He completely misunderstands Zoroastrian beliefs, claiming that the essence of it is that "Satan and God are equally powerful. According to Hovind, in Zoroastrianism "a lack of importance [is] placed on God. Which is fine, except for the fact that if the ancient Greeks, Zoroastrians, and eastern mystics were all budding proto-Darwinists, you might expect some historians and philosophers who study the ancients to have spotted it — and that the work of Darwin and Wallace in the nineteenth century might have been a bit less revolutionary and surprising than it actually was.
Ditto with the Comte de Buffon, who supposedly "was very influential in spreading the doctrine of evolution around the world", this after a long paragraph discussing "Voltair". Hovind claims that Hinduism , Zoroastrianism, Buddhism , Taoism , and Confucianism , which all are really evolution cults in disguise, made it easy for Communism to take over in China.
How this is possible is not known. Evolution was not initially researched till the s. On the same note, Communism has spread really well in Iranian Zoroastrian communities and in India , where Hinduism and Buddhism are prevalent. This hypothesis also explains the resistance to Chinese Communism by the Tibetan Buddhist monks really well, and the religious history of Russia and Cuba. In reality, the survival of the fittest found in Capitalist market economics has more to do with natural selection than the Communist ideal of "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.
Hovind also claims that "the Islam religion [sic] accepts evolution very readily", conveniently ignoring Islamic creationists like Harun Yahya. He also makes some pretty silly remarks about the Church Fathers which are backed up with the same sort of evidence as everything else in the dissertation — that is, about the same quality and quantity as you get in a Chick tract or the Weekly World News. Using the text from the OCR version of "Dr.
The Wikipedia page states that the average year-old student's written assignment has a "Reading Ease" of 60—70, which would indicate that the writing style of Kent's supposed PhD-level paper is on par with that of a pre-pubescent student. Similarly, the "Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level" indicates the approximate number of years of education needed to understand a piece of writing.
According to these metrics, a student in the 7th grade should be able to fully understand Kent's "doctoral research". The Automated Readability Index is another way of calculating the approximate grade required for a student to fully understand a piece of written work. Once again, the average 7th-grade student approximately 12—13 years old should be able to fully comprehend Kent's new research. None of these metrics are damning in and of themselves; all else being equal, being able to express one's ideas in simple and accessible language is a good thing.
However, there is a difference between expressing complex ideas in simple language and merely having simplistic ideas. Taken in the context of the thesis's other flaws, it becomes clear that complexity of thought was never among Hovind's issues. While Hovind was in federal prison, he wrote another dissertation for a Doctor of Ministry degree from Patriot.
Unlike his first dissertation, this one was written without chapters it does have seven appendices. In , it was published as an ebook titled What on Earth is about to happen.. Hovind appears to have copied some sort of standard format for the front matter of his 'dissertation': at the bottom of the title page, a feather-like logo with the text "Publisher logo" can be found.
Presumably, this is a placeholder for a real publisher logo — but Kent completely forgot about this. The verso of the title page which normally contains the publishing data, such as ISBN, catalogue data, and the publisher's address has a similar flaw, showing the text. In real books and dissertations, the "xxxxx-xxx-x" sequence is replaced by a proper ISBN number. Also note that "Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data" normally also contains a few keywords about the book in this case, "Christianity" and "Eschatology" would be the most likely, though "complete BS " would also not be wrong.
Hovind claims to have spent four years on this 'dissertation', but looked at this page and failed to see that something was missing. Jump to: navigation , search. See the Wikipedia article on Jupiter. For Heaven's Sake?
Retrieved 21 November Retrieved 9 October Skip Evans dies Retrieved 21 November Categories : Bronze-level articles Creationism. Namespaces Page Talk. Views Read Edit Fossil record. Support Donate. Community Saloon bar To do list What is going on?